Buyer's guide · Updated May 22, 2026
8 Best Finviz Alternatives in 2026
Finviz Elite is excellent if you want raw filter fields and you build your own thesis from the data. It's less useful if you want a synthesised composite score, an audit-able public scorecard. Here are the 8 alternatives we've actually used, ranked by what each does best — with honest verdicts about which competitor wins for which specific workflow.
Pricing verified against each vendor's public page on May 22, 2026. We rank Tapeline #1 because we built it for the criteria below — and we'll tell you directly when a competitor is the better pick. Spot a mistake? support@tapeline.io — we update within 48 hours.
TL;DR — the short answer
- Best overall Finviz alternative: Tapeline — six named scoring factors, per-pick scorecard, plain-English Why. An email and a password opens the scanner at ten rows a scan; a card is what shows every match and starts the 30-day Premium trial — $0 today, cancel online any time. Pro is $8.25/mo annual. The published record is readable with no account.
- Best for charting: TradingView — best-in-class charts and a 60M-strong community.
- Best for intraday day-trading: Trade Ideas — sub-second cadence + AI auto-execution, at $120+/mo.
- Best free option: Stockanalysis.com — genuinely usable free tier with full screener.
- Best for fundamentals depth: Stock Rover — 650+ fundamental metrics.
- Best for institutional-style data: Koyfin — Bloomberg-style dashboards at retail pricing.
- The published record — free to read, no account
- 30-day Premium trial — $0 today, cancel online any time
- Pro from $8.25/mo · $99.00/yr
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Scanner
Today’s actual top-scoring tickers · a saved snapshot that can be an hour old or more · prices delayed about 15 min
| Ticker | Sector | Score | Conf | Signal | 1D | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMM | Uncategorized | 85.0 | 100% | HIGH CONVICTION | +0.00% | trend factor near the top of its range. relative-strength factor in the top band vs the sector and smart-money factor near the top of its range. |
trend factor near the top of its range. relative-strength factor in… moretrend factor near the top of its range. relative-strength factor in the top band vs the sector and smart-money factor near the top of its range. | ||||||
| RDVT | Information Technology | 83.3 | 100% | STRONG SETUP | +0.00% | relative-strength among this ticker's highest-scoring factors vs the sector. trend factor near the top of its range and smart-money factor near the top of its range. |
relative-strength among this ticker's highest-scoring factors vs the… morerelative-strength among this ticker's highest-scoring factors vs the sector. trend factor near the top of its range and smart-money factor near the top of its range. | ||||||
| SBC | Health Care | 81.5 | 86% | STRONG SETUP | +0.00% | relative-strength factor near the top of its range vs the sector; trend among this ticker's highest-scoring factors; fundamentals factor in the top band (revenue, margin, ROE inputs). |
relative-strength factor near the top of its range vs the sector;… morerelative-strength factor near the top of its range vs the sector; trend among this ticker's highest-scoring factors; fundamentals factor in the top band (revenue, margin, ROE inputs). | ||||||
| ERO | Materials | 81.3 | 86% | STRONG SETUP | -0.71% | relative-strength factor in the top band vs materials peers — trend factor in the top band of its score, while fundamentals factor in the top band (revenue, margin, ROE inputs). |
relative-strength factor in the top band vs materials peers — trend… morerelative-strength factor in the top band vs materials peers — trend factor in the top band of its score, while fundamentals factor in the top band (revenue, margin, ROE inputs). | ||||||
| CPRX | Health Care | 79.8 | 86% | STRONG SETUP | -0.03% | trend factor near the top of its range — fundamentals among this ticker's highest-scoring factors, while relative-strength among this ticker's highest-scoring factors vs the sector. |
trend factor near the top of its range — fundamentals among this… moretrend factor near the top of its range — fundamentals among this ticker's highest-scoring factors, while relative-strength among this ticker's highest-scoring factors vs the sector. | ||||||
| NEOG | Health Care | 79.7 | 100% | STRONG SETUP | -1.96% | relative-strength factor in the top band vs the sector — trend factor in the top band of its score, while smart-money factor near the top of its range. |
relative-strength factor in the top band vs the sector — trend factor… morerelative-strength factor in the top band vs the sector — trend factor in the top band of its score, while smart-money factor near the top of its range. | ||||||
A preview of the Tapeline scanner (a cached snapshot, prices delayed about 15 minutes). Every liquid US stock & ETF, scored on six named factors.
Quick-pick by what you actually want
Skip the table — match your job-to-be-done to the recommended tool.
If you want: A multi-factor composite score per ticker with a published methodology and public scorecard
Pick: Tapeline →
If you want: Best-in-class charting + a massive community ideas feed
Pick: TradingView
If you want: Intraday day-trading with AI auto-execution (and you're willing to pay $120+/mo)
Pick: Trade Ideas
If you want: Institutional-grade fundamentals dashboards at retail pricing
Pick: Koyfin
If you want: Portfolio analytics for long-term buy-and-hold investors
Pick: Stock Rover
If you want: A free screener that's not artificially crippled
Pick: Stockanalysis.com ↗
If you want: Long-term DCF-led fundamental analysis with a distinctive visual
Pick: Simply Wall St
If you want: Traditional sell-side equity research + the Zacks Rank brand
Pick: Zacks Premium
Why look beyond Finviz?
Finviz Elite remains an excellent tool. The reasons users search for an alternative are usually one of these five — be honest about which one matches your situation.
1.You want a composite score, not 60 raw fields to filter against
Finviz Elite gives you a screener with 60+ technical and fundamental fields. That's powerful if your workflow is 'I have a thesis, let me filter the universe to match it.' It's exhausting if your workflow is 'I have an hour on Sunday — surface which 10 names are worth looking at this week.' Tapeline and Zacks both synthesise the data into a single number per ticker. Tapeline names all six factors behind that number and the order they're weighted in; Zacks names its inputs at a high level but not their weights.
2.You want an audit-able track record, not just self-reported stats
Finviz doesn't publish a scorecard of its screener results vs SPY. Most competitors report aggregate statistics that can't be reconciled to individual calls. Tapeline auto-logs each recorded daily top-10 pick at /scorecard with its rank, score and price, and the realized next-session return vs SPY, losing picks included and downloadable as CSV. Entries are not re-ranked or deleted. We have corrected recorded values twice, and said so: prices on 25 August 2026, and scores from 18 May to 12 June capped on 15 June 2026.
3.You want plain-English explanations, not just data
Finviz shows you the numbers. You interpret. That's correct for power users but it's a steep learning curve and a constant cognitive load. Tapeline includes a one-sentence Why on every row — what's driving the score right now — generated from the same six-factor synthesis. The Why shows on the public ticker pages too, with no account; nothing gated about the reasoning.
4.You want intraday speed without paying Trade Ideas pricing
Finviz Elite refreshes most fields every 1 minute, which is fine for swing trading but a beat slower than dedicated intraday tools. Trade Ideas runs sub-second but costs $120-240/mo. Tapeline is not an intraday speed tool: its prices are delayed about 15 minutes and re-read about every 60 seconds, at $8.25/mo annual. It fits screening for swing and position ideas, not timing entries.
Feature-by-feature comparison
Eight capabilities × eight tools. Filled circle = full support; half = limited; dash = not supported. Methodology behind each cell is in the per-tool sections below.
| Tool | Composite score | Scorecard | Intraday | Charting | Fundamentals | AI signals | Free tier | Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Tapeline | — | |||||||
| 2TradingView | — | — | ||||||
| 3Trade Ideas | — | |||||||
| 4Koyfin | — | — | — | |||||
| 5Stock Rover | — | — | — | |||||
| 6Stockanalysis.com | — | — | — | — | ||||
| 7Simply Wall St | — | — | — | |||||
| 8Zacks | — | — |
On the Free tier column: Tapeline reads "yes" because an email and a password opens the scanner on a free plan — the top ten scored rows of any scan, with one saved screen and a five-symbol watchlist. What a card buys is every matching row instead of the first ten, a second saved screen, alerts, CSV export and SEC Form 4 insider filings. Separately again, the published output — the daily Top 10, the full scorecard, a page per scored ticker and the raw CSV/JSON — needs no account at all.
At a glance: tools, prices, ratings
| # | Tool | Best for | Entry price | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tapeline | Multi-factor composite scoring with public methodology + scorecard | Free | 5.0/5 |
| 2 | TradingView | Charting, community ideas, asset breadth | Free | 5.0/5 |
| 3 | Trade Ideas | Intraday day-trading + AI auto-execution | ~$120/mo Standard | 4.0/5 |
| 4 | Koyfin | Bloomberg-style data terminal at retail pricing | Free | 4.0/5 |
| 5 | Stock Rover | Long-term fundamental investors + portfolio analytics | Free | 4.0/5 |
| 6 | Stockanalysis.com | Free fundamental data + free screener | Free | 4.0/5 |
| 7 | Simply Wall St | Visual long-term investing analysis (the 'Snowflake') | Free | 3.0/5 |
| 8 | Zacks | Earnings-revision-driven daily ranks + traditional research | ~$21/mo Premium (annual, $249/yr) | 3.0/5 |
The 8 alternatives, ranked
#1Tapeline5.0/5
Free · $8.25/mo Pro · $16.58/mo Premium (annual) · 30-day Premium trial, card requiredBest for: Multi-factor composite scoring with public methodology + scorecard
Pros
- ✓Six named scoring factors, published methodology — no black-box
- ✓Public scorecard back-checking each recorded daily top-10 pick vs SPY
- ✓Plain-English Why on every row — no upgrade gates the reasoning
- ✓Prices delayed about 15 minutes, re-read about every 60 seconds during US market hours
- ✓A free plan runs the scanner — ten scored rows per scan
- ✓Daily picks, full scorecard and raw CSV/JSON readable with no account
Tradeoffs
- ×Younger brand — launched 2026 (Finviz dates to 2007)
- ×No raw-filter screener with 60+ technical fields — synthesis-first approach
- ×The free plan stops at ten rows a scan — every match, alerts and CSV export need a card
Verdict: If your reason for using Finviz is 'I want a synthesised picture of which names are worth looking at this week', Tapeline is the upgrade — the score does the synthesis Finviz makes you do manually. Honest about what it doesn't do: if your job-to-be-done is raw filter density across 9,000+ tickers, stay on Finviz.
#2TradingView5.0/5
Free · ~$15/mo Essential · $30/mo Plus · $60/mo PremiumBest for: Charting, community ideas, asset breadth
Pros
- ✓Best-in-class HTML5 charting + Pine Script studies
- ✓60M+ user community with public ideas feed
- ✓Equities + crypto + FX + futures + bonds globally
- ✓Free tier is genuinely usable for charting
Tradeoffs
- ×No composite scoring — you build conviction from indicators
- ×Stock screener is functional but not the platform focus
- ×No first-party performance log on screener results
Verdict: If you live in charts and crowdsourced setups, TradingView replaces Finviz entirely. Pair with Tapeline for the scoring layer it doesn't try to provide.
#3Trade Ideas4.0/5
~$120/mo Standard · $240/mo PremiumBest for: Intraday day-trading + AI auto-execution
Pros
- ✓Sub-second intraday signal cadence
- ✓Holly AI auto-trader executes via integrated brokerages
- ✓OddsMaker custom strategy backtester
- ✓Built for active multi-monitor day-trading
Tradeoffs
- ×Holly AI is a proprietary black-box ML model — no published formula
- ×Pricing is 5x most peers; entry tier alone is $120/mo
- ×Desktop-first; mobile experience is limited
Verdict: Right tool if you're an active intraday trader and AI auto-execution is on the table. Overkill (and overpriced) for swing/positional traders looking for daily ranking.
#4Koyfin4.0/5
Free · ~$39/mo PlusBest for: Bloomberg-style data terminal at retail pricing
Pros
- ✓Institutional-quality fundamentals dashboards
- ✓Deep macro module (rates, FX, commodities, FOMC)
- ✓Multi-line, multi-axis custom-formula charting
- ✓Free tier covers most lookup needs
Tradeoffs
- ×Not a scanner — no composite score, no signal labels, no ranked output
- ×Workflow is dive-deep-on-one-name, not surface-which-names
- ×No published track record
Verdict: Closest retail-priced alternative to a Bloomberg Terminal. Pair with a scanner like Tapeline, not a replacement for one.
#5Stock Rover4.0/5
Free · $7.99–$27.99/mo (annual)Best for: Long-term fundamental investors + portfolio analytics
Pros
- ✓650+ fundamental metrics across 8,500+ stocks
- ✓Strong portfolio analytics and benchmarking
- ✓Equity research reports included on Premium tiers
- ✓Long histories for fundamental ratios
Tradeoffs
- ×Fundamental-investor lean — sparse intraday signals
- ×UI feels dated next to 2026-built tools
- ×No composite score with a public methodology
Verdict: Best Finviz alternative for buy-and-hold fundamental investors who want a portfolio analytics layer. Less suitable for active swing traders.
#6Stockanalysis.com4.0/5
Free · $24.50/mo Pro (annual)Best for: Free fundamental data + free screener
Pros
- ✓Genuinely useful free tier with full screener access
- ✓Clean fundamental data tables (income, balance, cash flow)
- ✓ETF and IPO data included
- ✓Pro tier removes ads and unlocks export
Tradeoffs
- ×No composite scoring or signal labels
- ×No real-time intraday update cadence
- ×No first-party scorecard
Verdict: Best free Finviz alternative. If you only need a basic screener and clean fundamental data tables, you don't need to pay anyone.
#7Simply Wall St3.0/5
Free · ~$10/mo Pro · ~$20/mo Premium (annual)Best for: Visual long-term investing analysis (the 'Snowflake')
Pros
- ✓Distinctive Snowflake visual showing 5 axes of analysis
- ✓Strong long-term valuation orientation (DCF-led)
- ✓Globally covers 90+ exchanges
- ✓Cheap entry tier
Tradeoffs
- ×Long-term investor lean — not a daily/weekly scanner
- ×Snowflake methodology has shifted over time without strong public changelog
- ×Limited intraday utility
Verdict: Pick Simply Wall St if you're a long-term investor doing fundamental due diligence. Pick Tapeline if you want a daily multi-factor synthesis with a public scorecard.
#8Zacks3.0/5
~$21/mo Premium (annual, $249/yr)Best for: Earnings-revision-driven daily ranks + traditional research
Pros
- ✓37-year track record on the Zacks Rank #1-#5 system
- ✓Strong analyst report library and equity research
- ✓Established brand with broad institutional acceptance
Tradeoffs
- ×Proprietary opaque-weighted ranking system
- ×Once-daily update cadence
- ×No per-pick public scorecard with original thesis preserved
Verdict: Pick Zacks if 37 years of brand history outweighs everything else and you want the curated equity research library. Pick Tapeline if transparency, speed, and per-pick accountability matter more.
How to migrate from Finviz Elite
Switching tools is a two-week project, not a weekend job. Here's the eight-step checklist we recommend — same checklist whether you're moving to Tapeline or any other alternative on this list. Don't cancel Finviz on day one.
- Step 1
Inventory the Finviz features you actually use weekly
Before you switch tools, list the Finviz workflows you genuinely use — screener filters? Maps view? News? Insider trading? Pre-market scanner? You'll find ~70% of your usage concentrates in 3-4 features. Migrate THOSE first; the rest can wait.
- Step 2
Pick the destination tool based on your top 3 features
Use the comparison matrix above. If your top features are 'composite score + scorecard + Why', that's Tapeline. If your top features are 'charts + ideas + community', that's TradingView. If your top features are 'raw filters + universe breadth', stay on Finviz — none of these alternatives wins that comparison.
- Step 3
Run both tools in parallel for two weeks
Don't cancel Finviz yet. Use the new tool's free tier or trial, replicate your usual screen each morning, see if the results are actionable. Tapeline's free plan is built for exactly this: an email and a password opens the scanner, and you see the top ten scored rows of whatever scan you build, plus one saved screen you can come back to. Add a card only if the parallel run tells you that you want every matching row, alerts and CSV export — that starts the 30-day Premium trial, $0 that day, first charge on day 30, cancel online any time before then. TradingView and Stockanalysis.com both have free tiers too.
- Step 4
Recreate your screener filters in the new tool
Most Finviz screen logic ports cleanly. Tapeline replaces raw filters with min-score thresholds and signal-label filters — narrower interface but covers the same intent. TradingView's screener accepts custom Pine script for power-user filters.
- Step 5
Set up alerts to replace your Finviz email digest
If you relied on Finviz's email alerts, make sure the new tool has alerts of comparable cadence. Tapeline Pro includes 10 email alerts/day; Premium goes up to 50/day. TradingView's alert system is more granular but costs extra on free tier.
- Step 6
Migrate your saved watchlist
Most tools accept CSV import. Export your Finviz watchlist as CSV, import into the new tool. Tapeline's watchlist accepts up to 200 tickers on Premium. Map ticker symbols by hand for any odd ADRs or recent IPOs that the new tool doesn't recognise.
- Step 7
Verify the public-facing pages and shareable links
If you share Finviz screen URLs with friends or in tweets, check the alternative's equivalent. Tapeline's per-ticker pages (/t/NVDA) are public and indexed; the scanner requires auth but per-ticker score + signal is shareable.
- Step 8
Cancel Finviz Elite — or keep it for the 30% of features the new tool doesn't replicate
After two parallel weeks, decide. Most users find they cancel Finviz entirely. Some keep it on the cheaper Basic tier for occasional raw-filter access. Tapeline + Finviz Basic costs less per month than Finviz Elite alone, with most workflows now in Tapeline.
How we ranked them
Five weighted criteria: transparency of methodology (is the scoring method disclosed?); data freshness (intraday vs once-daily); evidence of performance (per-pick scorecard, aggregate stats, or none); workflow completeness (screening through to per-ticker pages, alerts, and watchlists); and value at the entry price.
We ranked Tapeline #1 because it's the only tool that names every factor in its composite and pairs it with a per-pick public scorecard — the two transparency criteria. We were honest in every section about which competitor wins for which workflow: we'd rather you pick TradingView for charting or Trade Ideas for intraday than churn out of the wrong tool in three months.
Pricing verified against each vendor's public pricing page on May 22, 2026. Spot a mistake? support@tapeline.io — we update within 48 hours.
Frequently asked
What's the closest free alternative to Finviz Elite?
+
Stockanalysis.com offers the closest free experience — full screener access without a paywall, fundamental data tables, and ETF/IPO coverage. TradingView's free tier covers charting and a basic screener. Tapeline's free plan is a different shape: an email and a password opens the scanner, but you see the top ten scored rows of a scan rather than every match, and alerts and CSV export are what a card turns on. Its published output stays free to read with no account at all: the daily Top 10, the whole scorecard, a page per scored ticker, and the raw CSV/JSON record. None of these match Finviz Elite's 60+ raw screener fields, but each is honest about what it provides.
Why isn't Finviz the right tool for everyone?
+
Finviz Elite is excellent for traders who want raw screener filters and build their own thesis from the data. It's less useful for traders who want a synthesised composite score per ticker, a plain-English explanation of why each name ranks where it does, or an audit-able public scorecard of historical picks. The right alternative depends on which job you were hiring Finviz to do.
Which Finviz alternative offers a public scorecard?
+
Tapeline is the only tool on this list that auto-publishes each recorded daily top-10 pick with the realized next-day return vs SPY at /scorecard, open to everyone 7 days after the session. Most competitors report aggregate statistics (e.g., 'historical Rank #1 returns'); few publish a dated, per-pick record.
How was this list ranked?
+
The ranking weighs five things: transparency of methodology, freshness of data, evidence of past performance, completeness of the workflow (from screening to alerts to per-ticker pages), and value at the price. Tapeline ranks #1 because it's the only tool that names every factor in its composite and pairs it with a per-pick public scorecard — but the right tool for you depends on whether your workflow needs charting (TradingView), institutional data (Koyfin), or AI auto-execution (Trade Ideas).
Is there a Finviz alternative that beats it on raw screener filter count?
+
Stock Rover offers more fundamental fields (650+) than Finviz; TradingView's screener is comparably broad on technicals. Few tools target raw filter count as a feature — most modern alternatives focus on synthesis or specialised data (insider filings, alternative-data signals). If raw filter count is the deciding factor, stay on Finviz Elite — none of these tools is trying to win that comparison.
How much does Finviz Elite cost vs the alternatives in 2026?
+
Finviz Elite is $39.50/mo monthly or $24.96/mo billed annually ($299.52/yr). The alternatives at comparable or lower price: Tapeline Pro $8.25/mo annual, Stock Rover Essentials $7.99/mo annual, Stockanalysis.com Pro $24.50/mo annual, Simply Wall St Pro ~$10/mo annual. Higher: TradingView Premium $60/mo annual, Trade Ideas $120-240/mo. Pricing verified against vendor pages on 2026-05-22.
Can I use Tapeline + Finviz together?
+
Yes — they solve different problems. Many traders run Tapeline for daily synthesis (which names to look at) and keep Finviz Basic for raw-filter deep dives when they have a specific thesis to test. Combined cost is lower than Finviz Elite alone, and the workflows complement rather than overlap.
Which Finviz alternative is best for swing traders specifically?
+
Tapeline. The composite score is designed for the multi-day setup horizon — it leans most on Trend and Relative Strength, plus Fundamentals, for stability over multiple sessions, with Momentum and Smart Money contributing to entry timing. The /best-stocks-for/swing-traders page surfaces the top 30 names by composite score, filtered to 65+ (top third of the distribution). TradingView is the next-best fit if you'd rather build setups from charts than work from a ranked list.
Which Finviz alternative is best for day traders specifically?
+
Trade Ideas if you can afford $120+/mo and want AI auto-execution. Tapeline is not built for timing day trades: its prices are delayed about 15 minutes. Its /best-stocks-for/day-traders page filters to today's biggest movers AND composite 60+ for confluence. TradingView for chart-driven entries. Finviz Elite remains competitive for raw-filter pre-market scans.
What's the best Finviz alternative for fundamentals investors?
+
Stock Rover wins on pure fundamental breadth (650+ metrics). Koyfin wins on data-quality and dashboard depth. Simply Wall St wins on long-term DCF visualisation. Tapeline wins on putting fundamentals in context — the Fundamentals factor is one of six, balanced against trend and macro so you don't accidentally buy a value trap.
Are there mobile-first Finviz alternatives?
+
Tapeline, TradingView, Koyfin, Stockanalysis.com, and Simply Wall St all have functional mobile experiences. Stock Rover and Trade Ideas are desktop-first. Finviz itself is responsive but the UI density makes it cramped on phones. If you primarily check signals on a phone, Tapeline's per-ticker pages and mobile scanner render well on small screens.
Try the #1 pick — the scanner.
The published record — daily Top 10, full scorecard, raw CSV/JSON — stays free with no account. An account is an email and a password: the scanner opens on the free plan at ten scored rows a scan. A card is what shows every matching row and turns on alerts and CSV export — it starts the 30-day Premium trial, $0 today, first charge on day 30, cancel online any time. Pro from $8.25/mo ($99.00/yr), with a 30-day money-back guarantee. Keep your existing Finviz subscription if you want — they solve different problems.